We have added the following studies to the Bibliography pages:
French, B. H., Tilghman, J. D., & Malebranche, D. A. (2014). Sexual coercion context and psychosocial correlates among diverse males. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. Advance online publication doi:dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035915
Hovey, A., Stalker, C., & Rye, B. (2014). Asking women survivors about thoughts or actions involving sex with children: An issue requiring therapist sensitivity. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse.
Ratliff, L., & Watson, J. (2014). A descriptive analysis of public school educators arrested for sex offenses. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 23(2), 217-228. doi:10.1080/10538712.2014.870275
Staunton, C., Hammond, S., Perkins, D., & Lambert, S. (2014). Biosignal measures of female sexual interest: Their feasibility in a forensic context. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 4(1), 59-75. doi:10.1108/JCP-11-2012-0019
We hope to have a new post about one of them soon.
We have added the following to the Bibliographies and still have more to add!
Allsopp, R. (2014). Moral panics, the media and male and female offenders of child sexual abuse. Internet Journal of Criminology, 1-20.
Carpenter, B., O’Brien, E., Hayes, S., & Death, J. (2014). Harm, responsibility, age, and consent. New Criminal Law Review, 17(1), 23-54.
Javaid, A. (2014). Male rape: The ‘invisible’ male. Internet Journal of Criminology, 1-42.
Mallett, X., & Karp, J. (2014). Child sex offender demographics. In Advances in forensic human identification (pp. 59-73). CRC Press
We have added more research to the Bibliography pages:
Darling, A. J., & Antonopoulos, G. A. (2013). ‘Notes on a scandal’: Why do females engage in abuse of trust behaviours? International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 2, 525-537.
Abstract: Although an evident reality in organisations where females work with young people, there has been no specific research to date exploring why females in positions of trust engage in sexually abusive relationships with adolescents. This study investigated the subject through a qualitative analysis of ten case studies from England drawn from the employment and safeguarding environment, comparing findings with existing studies into female sexual offenders in general, research into male ‘professional perpetrators’ and Gannon et al.’s (2008) Descriptive Model of Female Sexual Offending. The research highlighted a number of key similarities and differences between those who abuse in positions of trust and those female sexual offenders who abuse children in wider contexts. With respect to etiological factors the similarities included unstable lifestyle, relationship difficulties, low self-esteem, cognitive distortions and emotional self-management problems. Motivations for this sample appeared to be primarily driven by intimacy needs. Differences were identified relating to lower levels of substance abuse, a higher age range and socio-economic status, less prevalence of severe social skills deficits and chaotic and abusive backgrounds in this subject group. All of the women in the study followed an Implicit Disorganised pathway of abuse and maternal approach to the abusive behaviour.